Which Method has Proven More Reliable: Divine Revelation or Science?

Image result for image of frances bacon
Francis Bacon

Conservative Christian:  When one believes that science is at least the most reliable or meaningful way to truth, if not the only way to find truth, one is promoting scientism. It seems that most people who hold to such views come out of a materialistic worldview and promote scientific materialism. It also seems quite popular in academia and even in some more “educated” areas of society.  Scientism, however, is not science, rather it is an arbitrary and non-factual worldview.

…The often overlooked fact of our day and age is that Christians made the scientific enterprise, and built it upon biblical principles and presuppositions. It grew out of philosophy and Christian theology.

Gary:  I don’t know of too many skeptics who claim that science is the one and only source of truth. What most of us do claim is that science has proven to be the most RELIABLE source of investigating our universe. Compare the accuracy of the truth formulations of science (stated as “theories” ) with the truth formulations (doctrines, dogma) of the world’s religions (including Christianity) and one sees just how much more reliable science is compared to religion.

And one great thing about science is that there are no sacred cows. Isaac Newton’s theories stood for centuries only to be drastically revised in the twentieth century by Albert Einstein. Any scientific theory or “law” is open to revision or even abandonment when new and better evidence is discovered. One scientist’s new evidence is never accepted as “fact” until it has been reviewed and picked apart by other scientists in the field. Scientists LOVE to prove each other’s theories wrong! This may seem harsh but it is what keeps science so up to date, fine tuned, and so remarkably reliable.

Look at what happens in religion when someone presents new evidence that challenges a well-established Christian doctrine or teaching. Established religion did not greet Copernicus’ new astronomical theory with enthusiasm and eagerness to review his evidence but by denunciation. Religion has doctrines (dogmas) which cannot be challenged. Scientific theories are ALWAYS open to challenge. Challenge and scrutiny in science is welcomed and encouraged while in religion it is denounced and even persecuted.

So, science is not the answer to all questions. But believing that science is the best method for evaluating our universe is not anti-God. One can still believe in God and believe that science is the best method of evaluating universal truth claims. No, you can’t use science to determine if your spouse really loves you, if blue is the best color, or if the Patriots are the greatest football team of all time. But those are not universal truths. Those are opinions and preferences.

And what about the claim that science developed out of Christianity? I would say that science developed IN SPITE OF Christianity. It is true that the scientific method was first enunciated by Francis Bacon, a professing Christian, but his insights were founded on Roman and Greek philosophical principles combined with philosophical principles from the Muslim East. So to say that science is a direct result of Christianity is false. Read this article about the true history of the scientific method:

Image result for copernicus
Nicolaus Copernicus

Source:  The Dark Ages, circa A.D. 500 to 1100, were characterized by a general erosion of civilization. Knowledge from the ancient Romans survived in only a few monasteries and cathedral and palace schools, while knowledge from ancient Greece almost disappeared completely. From right before the Dark Ages until about a century after, there were almost no important scientific advances. The Catholic Church became very powerful in Europe, and religious dogma governed much of what people thought and believed. Those whose beliefs or practices strayed from the church were “rehabilitated” and brought back into the fold. Resistance often led to persecution.

Then, in what is now known as the Renaissance of the 12th century, came a period of reawakening. As European scholars became exposed to knowledge and cultures cultivated in the Islamic world and other regions beyond their boundaries, they became reacquainted with the works of ancient scholars like Aristotle, Ptolemy and Euclid. This provided a common platform and vocabulary on which to build an extended scientific community that could share ideas and inspire creative problem-solving.

Some of the important thinkers to emerge during and after the Renaissance include:

  • Albertus Magnus (1193-1250) and Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), two students of scholasticism, a philosophical system emphasizing the use of reason in exploring questions of philosophy and theology. Magnus made a distinction between revealed truth (revelation of something unknown through a divine power) and experimental science and made many scientific observations in astronomy, chemistry, geography and physiology.
  • Roger Bacon (c.1210-c.1293), an English Franciscan friar, philosopher, scientist and scholar who called for an end to blind acceptance of widely accepted writings. In particular, he targeted Aristotle’s ideas, which, while valuable, were often accepted as fact even when evidence did not support them.
  • Francis Bacon (1561-1626), a successful lawyer and influential philosopher who did much to reform scientific thinking. In his “Instauratio Magna­,” Bacon proposed a new approach to scientific inquiry, which he published in 1621 as the “Novum Organum Scientiarum.” This new approach advocated inductive reasoning as the foundation of scientific thinking. Bacon also argued that only a clear system of scientific inquiry would assure man’s mastery over the world.

Francis Bacon was the first to formalize the concept of a true scientific method, but he didn’t do so in a vacuum.

 

 

 

 

End of post.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Which Method has Proven More Reliable: Divine Revelation or Science?

  1. I’ve found the Holy Spirit will testify to any damned thing the person wants it too. That’s how you get 40,000+ versions of Christianity — each and every one of them based in a positive revelation from the Holy Spirit.

    I’m pretty sure the Holy Spirit is the trickster god of the Trinity.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Yes, if the spirit of Jesus truly resides inside the body and brain of every believer on the planet as the Good Book tells us, one wonders why Jesus’ messsage is heard/understood so differently by so many Christians. There seems to be a serious communication problem.

      Liked by 5 people

  2. Just some highlights of ONE area of world civilizations, particularly around the Mediterranean, but mostly Europe… for the history of public health:

    Antiquity — 8th century BCE to c. 476 CE: Phenomenal advances were made because of scientific inquiry.

    • Scientific theories about disease begins in Greece; “Airs, Waters, and Places” by Hippocrates.

    • Hindu Ayurveda lists herbal medicinal treatments (4000-3000 BCE).

    • Eygptian and Akkadian records of gastronomy, gynecology, opthomology, urology, hematology, and herbal medicines as well as surgical treatises.

    • Alcmaeon of Croton considered the Father of many medical disciplines (510-430 BCE).

    • Herodotus confirms Egyptians were highly trained and educated in medicine, surgery, and healing (484-425 BCE).

    • Hippocratic Oath in 420 BCE for rational scientific medicine.

    • Aulus Cornelius Celsus composes first medical encyclopedia in 25 BCE – 50 CE.

    • Pedanius Dioscorides writes De Materia Medica in 50-70 CE, a precursor to pharmacopoeias.

    Dark Ages — 476 CE to c. 1599 CE: Millions upon billions of people die due to an age of ignorance and the loss of valuable life-saving Ancient medical scientific knowledge and widely accepted health practices.

    • After the East-West split of the crumbling Roman Empire, for the next 1,100 years the Roman Catholic Church banned most advanced medical and scientific treatments and doctors, or Black Magicians, as the Devil’s work from Satanic lands.

    • Bubonic Plague of 542 CE. Treated in Europe by isolation/quarantine and blood-letting. It did not work.

    • From the 7th-century CE thru the 14th-century CE leprosy, a 2nd bubonic plague, smallpox, tuberculosis, scabies, erysipelas, anthrax, trachoma, sweating sickness, and dancing mania all became lethal epidemics wiping out billions of European-Mediterranean peoples primarily because the vast majority of medical knowledge and practices from Antiquity were replaced by Superstition, prayers, horrible quarantine practices, and useless blood-letting.

    The Renaissance — 16th-century CE to Modern 21st-century: Humanity is SAVED by the return of PUBLIC medical and scientific inquiry, education, and practices!

    • Once highly educated leaders finally recognized scientific advances of the 16th and 17th centuries (based largely on advances in Antiquity!) laid the foundations of anatomy and physiology. Observation and classification made possible the more precise recognition of diseases. The idea that microscopic organisms might cause communicable diseases had begun to take shape.

    Among the early pioneers in public health medicine was English statistician John Graunt, who in 1662 published a book of statistics, which had been compiled by parish and municipal councils, that gave numbers for deaths and sometimes suggested their causes. Inevitably the numbers were inaccurate but a start was made in epidemiology. *

    • Many ancient, historical diseases have now been completely eradicated or are so well managed medically/clinically that they are near eradiction all because of scientific methodologies and constant research into the plethora of environmental, human, and sanitatory causalities, their PUBLIC education/awareness, and their treatments by highly trained physicians, clinics, medicine, surgery, and hospitals—NOT “Faiths,” priests, churches or mosques, or blaming ailments and diseases on a ficticious Devil or Evilness. Period!

    Great stuff Gary and outstanding rebuttle to the grossly antiquated “Conservative Christian”! 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s