Best Strategy to Engage Christians: Debating Evidence or Non-Confrontational Probing?

Two prominent atheist counter-apologists discuss different strategies for engaging Christians and other believers regarding their supernatural beliefs.  One man is known for his very confrontational style of debating evidence with believers, the other is known for his very non-confrontational, passive, approach called “street epistemology” in which he gently challenges believers to examine the rationality of their beliefs.

Which strategy is better?

 

 

 

End of post.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s