Conservative Christian blogger:
I don’t understand why we should even have a conversation about any of this at all. If there is no evidence that would have been available to a handful of people in the 1st century that would convince you in the 21st century that a supernatural event [the Resurrection] occurred, then all of the discussion about whether or not the gospels were written by eyewitnesses, and their reliability seems completely irrelevant. It seems that none of the conclusions would make any difference to you so why are we even discussing it? Why does it even matter to you then?
It matters to me for several reasons:
1. It is a fascinating subject since so many people on the planet consider this alleged event as the most important event in human history.
2. I enjoy a good debate.
3. I believe that superstitions are one of the greatest causes of human suffering, now and in the past.
4. I believe that the belief in the Resurrection is a superstition; a superstition that lies at the heart of one of the world’s largest supernatural belief systems; a belief system that has inflicted incredible violence and discrimination on non-adherents for the last 2000 years.
5. It excites me to be part of one of the greatest movements in the history of humanity: the debunking of religious superstitions and their eventual demise.