Christianity is a House of Cards



We skeptics (atheists, agnostics, naturalists, etc.) reject the supernatural. It’s not that we have evidence to disprove the supernatural, it is that we choose not to believe in **anything** that can not be examined by the scientific method and reason. For this reason, we do not believe in leprechauns, Santa Claus, fairies, unicorns, goblins, etc. And for this reason, we do not believe in virgin births, water-walking, or walking/talking zombies.

Believers obviously **do** believe in the supernatural. However, I for one wish that Christians would just be honest and concede that, in our daily lives as human beings, even if the supernatural exists, a supernatural explanation for any event is typically the last of all possible explanations. Specifically, a supernatural explanation should be the last explanation considered for an event if there are numerous natural explanations that can fully explain the event.

So will Christians concede that their belief system is built upon the pattern of accepting the least likely explanations for multiple ancient events instead of accepting the most probable natural explanation?

For instance, which is more probable?

1. A virgin was impregnated by a divine ghost or an early Christian made up this detail?
2. Jesus really walked on water, or this story was made up or developed as a legend?
3. Jesus tomb was empty because an ancient Hebrew god had resuscitated him, or someone had moved or stolen the body?
4. The Gospels were written by eyewitnesses who copied Mark, a non-eyewitness, to write their stories, or the Gospels were written by people writing down the version of the story currently circulating in their town/country?
5. The eloquent, highly stylistic Gospels were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—Galilean peasants (except Luke)– or were written by anonymous, educated Greek-speaking Christians who were not eyewitnesses but were only repeating a story that they had heard?
6. Early Christians believed in a Resurrection because they had really seen a walking/talking dead body or because superstitious, poor, uneducated, despondent disciples had visions, hallucinations, and false sightings of their beloved leader?

Christians must repeatedly accept the supernatural explanation for one biblical and historical event after another to maintain their belief system. Even if just one of these assumptions is false, the entire house of cards comes crashing down.

Isn’t that a problem?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Christianity is a House of Cards

  1. Nice title – Christianity is a House of Cards. This is very true. Christianity is a House of Cards to unbelievers.

    They randomly ask questions and hope to debunk the entire faith. Pull one card here and pull one card there and hope the whole thing will collapse.

    Just look how atheists run their forum.

    The Bible is the foundation of Christianity. These people block and ban people who quote the Bible but they use they quote the Bible to discredit the Faith.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s