The Gospel of John is inconsistent with the Synoptic Gospels

Excerpt from:  “Why I am not a Christian” by Keith M. Parsons

[J.W.] Montgomery’s position is that, unless it is possible to point to actual contradictions between John and the synoptics, they can be regarded as complementing each other.

From this premise we should have to suppose thatas E.P. Sanders puts it apropos of the discrepancies in the teachings:

“Jesus spent his short ministry teaching in two such completely different ways, conveying such different contents, and that there were simply two traditions, each going back to Jesus, one transmitting 50 per cent of what he said and another one the other 50 per cent, with almost no overlaps.” Hence, he adds, scholars have almost unanimously concluded that the fourth gospel “represents an advanced theological development, in which meditations on the person and work of Christ are presented in the first person, as if Jesus said them” (Historical Jesus, pp. 70-71). (Wells, 1996, pp. 103-104).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s